Electronic Theses and Dissertation

Penulisan studi kasus ini memiliki tujuan untuk menjelaskan putusan hakim yang mengabaikan alat-alat bukti yang dihadirkan ,dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam memutus unsur pasal, dan menjelaskan dalam menjatuhkan putusan apakah sudah terpenuhinya tujuan hukum yaitu keadilan, kepastian dan kemanfaatan. Hasil analisa studi kasus ini menjelaskan bahwa hakim dalam mempertimbangkan putusan diangap kurang cermat dalam memberi putusan tidak bersalah atas dakwaan primair Jaksa Penuntut umum. Menurut pertimbangan hakim tidak terbuktinya unsur materiil dalam tuntutan, dan tidak tercapainya penerapan pidana dalam putusan nomor295/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.BNA. Serta telah sempurnanya terpenuhi tujuan hukum, yaitu keadilan, kepastian dan kemanfaatan hukum dalam masyarakat

– The purpose of writing this case study is to explain the judge's decision which ignores the evidence presented, the basis for the judge's consideration in deciding the elements of the article, and to explain in making the decision whether the legal objectives have been fulfilled, namely justice, certainty and expediency. The results of the analysis of this case study explain that the judge in considering the decision was considered less careful in giving a verdict of not guilty on the primary charge of the Public Prosecutor. According to the judge's consideration, the material elements in the prosecution were not proven, and the criminal application was not achieved in the decision number 295/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.BNA. And the legal objectives have been perfectly fulfilled, namely justice, certainty and the benefit of law in society.