<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" id="166719">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING:</title>
  <subTitle>AN EMPIRICAL STUDY IN THE ASEAN REGION</subTitle>
 </titleInfo>
 <name type="Personal Name" authority="">
  <namePart>Fathia Khalisah Munthe</namePart>
  <role>
   <roleTerm type="text">Primary Author</roleTerm>
  </role>
 </name>
 <typeOfResource manuscript="no" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
 <genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
 <originInfo>
  <place>
   <placeTerm type="text">Banda Aceh</placeTerm>
   <publisher>Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis</publisher>
   <dateIssued>2025</dateIssued>
  </place>
 </originInfo>
 <language>
  <languageTerm type="code"></languageTerm>
  <languageTerm type="text"></languageTerm>
 </language>
 <physicalDescription>
  <form authority="gmd">Skripsi</form>
  <extent></extent>
 </physicalDescription>
 <note>This study examines the effect of corporate governance on sustainability reporting in six ASEAN countries including Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam. Grounded in agency theory and legitimacy theory, this research analyzes the influence of board size, board independence, women on board, CSR committee, CEO duality, multiple directorships, audit committee independence, and Big 4 auditors on sustainability reporting. The study uses a purposive sampling method on 60 listed companies that consistently published GRI-based sustainability reports from 2021 to 2023, resulting in 180 firm year observations. Sustainability reporting is measured using the Global Reporting Initiative Standards 2016. The analysis employs panel data regression. The findings reveal that board independence, CSR committee, multiple directorships, and audit committee independence have a significant positive effect on sustainability reporting. Board size, women on board, CEO duality, and Big 4 auditors show positive but insignificant effects, while board size has a negative and insignificant relationship. This study provides empirical evidence on the role of governance mechanisms in influencing sustainability reporting in the ASEAN region and offers insights for regulators, companies, and investors to enhance transparency and accountability in sustainable business practices.&#13;
&#13;
Keywords: Corporate Governance, Sustainability Reporting, GRI Standards, ASEAN, Board Independence, CSR Committee, Panel Data&#13;
</note>
 <note type="statement of responsibility"></note>
 <classification>0</classification>
 <identifier type="isbn"></identifier>
 <location>
  <physicalLocation>ELECTRONIC THESES AND DISSERTATION Universitas Syiah Kuala</physicalLocation>
  <shelfLocator></shelfLocator>
 </location>
 <slims:digitals/>
</mods>
<recordInfo>
 <recordIdentifier>166719</recordIdentifier>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2025-07-24 16:06:07</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2025-07-24 16:10:53</recordChangeDate>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</modsCollection>