Electronic Theses and Dissertation

Menurut data konsolidasi bersih dari DUKCAPIL (2023), di Kecamatan Indrapuri
penduduk yang berstatus pelajar/mahasiswa adalah yang paling banyak yaitu sebanyak
6.221 jiwa dari keseluruhan penduduk yang bekerja. Data ini menunjukkan bahwa banyak
penduduk yang masih menjadi tanggungan kepala rumah tangganya. Oleh karena itu,
diperlukan melakukan keragaman sumber pendapatan dalam rumah tangga agar kondisi
sosial ekonomi rumah tangga tidak mengalami ketimpangan. Sehingga tujuan penelitian ini
adalah mengetahui kondisi sosial ekonomi rumah tangga, mengetahui keragaman sumber
pendapatan rumah tangga, mengetahui hubungan karakteristik rumah tangga dengan pola
penghidupan, dan mengetahui kontribusi keragaman sumber pendapatan rumah tangga
terhadap total pendapatan rumah tangga di Kecamatan Indrapuri. Penelitian ini dilakukan
pada tanggal 2 Mei 2024 sampai 9 Juni 2024. Jenis data yang digunakan data primer
(observasi dan wawancara terstrukruktur) dan data sekunder (laporan BPS Indrapuri dan
Aceh Besar, dan DKB DUKCAPIL 2023). Data kemudian dianalisis dengan analisis
deskriptif (crosstab) dan analisis non parametrik (uji Chi-Square).
Hasil menunjukkan bahwa Kondisi sosial ekonomi Kecamatan Indrapuri di keempat desa
hampir sama. Perbedaannya hanya terletak pada pertumbuhan penduduk dimana desa
Indrapuri yang piramida penduduknya berbentuk stationer sementara yang lainnya
berbentuk ekspansif. Kondisi sosial ekonomi rumah tangga secara keseluruhan, mayoritas
kepala rumah tangga berumur Rp2.128.000, dan berpendapatan sedang dalam rentang
Rp2.000.000-Rp4.000.000/bulan. Kemudian rumah tangga yang memiliki ART yang
bekerja sedikit. Keragaman sumber pendapatan rumah tangga di Kecamatan Indrapuri
berasal dari dua sumber yaitu sumber pendapatan utama yang berasal dari pekerjaan utama
responden, dan sumber pendapatan tambahan yang berasal dari pekerjaan sampingan
responden dan ART yang bekerja. Jika dilihat dari pola penghidupan, keragaman sumber
pendapatan membentuk 7 pola penghidupan, yaitu: on farm, off farm, non farm, on farm +
off farm, on farm + non farm, off farm + non farm, dan on farm + off farm + non farm.
Variabel umur, pendidikan, jumlah tanggungan, dan pengeluaran rumah tangga tidak
berpengaruh terhadap pola penghidupan rumah tangga. Sedangkan variabel luas lahan
sawah, kepemilikan ternak, pendapatan kepala rumah tangga, jarak ke pasar, dan jumlah
ART bekerja berpengaruh terhadap penerapan pola penghidupan rumah tangga. Kontribusi
terbesar dalam keragaman sumber pendapatan adalah pekerjaan utama responden (61,2%).
Kemudian diikuti oleh pekerjaan sampingan responden (30,6%) dan ART yang bekerja
(8,2%). Jika dilihat berdasarkan pola penghidupan rumah tangga, pola penghidupan on
farm saja menyumbang kontribusi paling banyak (18%), dan paling sedikit adalah
kombinasi on farm + non farm dan kombinasi ketiganya (12%).
Sehingga kesimpulannya adalah kondisi sosial ekonomi hampir sama, keragaman sumber
pendapatan berasal dari 2 sumber dan 7 pola penghidupan, dan kontribusi terhadap total
pendapatan rumah tangga paling besar pekerjaan utama dan pola penghidupan on farm.

According to the net consolidation data from DUKCAPIL (2023), in Indrapuri District, the population with student status is the largest, totaling 6,221 individuals out of the entire working population. This data shows that many residents are still dependents of their household heads. Therefore, it is necessary to diversify income sources within households so that the socio-economic conditions of households do not experience disparities. Thus, the purpose of this research is to understand the socio-economic conditions of households, to know the diversity of household income sources, to understand the relationship between household characteristics and livelihood patterns, and to determine the contribution of the diversity of household income sources to total household income in Indrapuri District. This research was conducted from May 2, 2024, to June 9, 2024. The types of data used are primary data (observation and structured interviews) and secondary data (reports from BPS Indrapuri and Aceh Besar, and DKB DUKCAPIL 2023). The data was then analyzed using descriptive analysis (crosstab) and non-parametric analysis (Chi Square test). The results show that the socio-economic conditions in Indrapuri District across the four villages are almost the same. The only difference lies in population growth, where Indrapuri village has a stationary population pyramid while the others have an expansive shape. The overall socio-economic conditions of households indicate that the majority of household heads are under 45 years old, have a high school education, have 2 to 4 dependents, do not own rice fields, and do not have livestock. The average household expenditure is >Rp2,128,000, and the income is moderate, ranging from Rp2,000,000 to Rp4,000,000/month. Furthermore, households with working domestic workers are few. The diversity of household income sources in Indrapuri District comes from two sources: the main income source from the respondents' main jobs, and additional income sources from the respondents' side jobs and working domestic workers. In terms of livelihood patterns, the diversity of income sources forms 7 livelihood patterns, namely: on-farm, off- farm, non-farm, on-farm + off-farm, on-farm + non-farm, off-farm + non-farm, and on- farm + off-farm + non-farm. The variables of age, education, number of dependents, and household expenditure do not affect household livelihood patterns. Meanwhile, the variables of rice field area, livestock ownership, household head income, distance to the market, and number of working domestic workers influence the application of household livelihood patterns. The largest contribution to the diversity of income sources comes from the respondents' main jobs (61.2%). This is followed by the respondents' side jobs (30.6%) and working domestic workers (8.2%). Based on the household livelihood patterns, the on-farm livelihood pattern alone contributes the most (18%), while the least is the combination of on-farm + non-farm and the combination of all three (12%). Thus, the conclusion is that the socio-economic conditions are almost the same, the diversity of income sources comes from 2 sources and 7 livelihood patterns, and the contribution to total household income is greatest from the main jobs and the on-farm livelihood pattern.