<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" id="115413">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>ANALYSIS OF REGULATION AND APPLICATION OF FAIR USE DOCTRINE ON THE YOUTUBE PLATFORM (A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INDONESIA AND UNITED STATES LAWS)</title>
 </titleInfo>
 <name type="Personal Name" authority="">
  <namePart>Nurhijriati</namePart>
  <role>
   <roleTerm type="text">Primary Author</roleTerm>
  </role>
 </name>
 <typeOfResource manuscript="no" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
 <genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
 <originInfo>
  <place>
   <placeTerm type="text">Banda Aceh</placeTerm>
   <publisher>Fakultas Hukum</publisher>
   <dateIssued>2023</dateIssued>
  </place>
 </originInfo>
 <language>
  <languageTerm type="code"></languageTerm>
  <languageTerm type="text"></languageTerm>
 </language>
 <physicalDescription>
  <form authority="gmd">Skripsi</form>
  <extent></extent>
 </physicalDescription>
 <note>ABSTRACT &#13;
                            NURHIJRIATI          ANALYSIS OF REGULATION AND  &#13;
(2023)                    APPLICATION OF FAIR USE DOCTRINE     &#13;
ON THE YOUTUBE PLATFORM&#13;
(A Comparative Study of  Indonesia and                     &#13;
United States Laws)&#13;
Faculty of Law, Syiah Kuala University  &#13;
(viii, 75) pp., tbl., bibl. &#13;
      ( Eka Kurniasari, S.H., M.H., LLM) &#13;
YouTube has implemented a fair use policy, allowing YouTuber to reuse&#13;
copyrighted material without getting permission from copyright owner under&#13;
certain categories and limitations. This policy  follows US copyright law of&#13;
1976, It has clearly parameter of limitations. Meanwhile Indonesian copyright&#13;
law has a differently perspective regulations and application fair use in video&#13;
that upload on the YouTube platform, it has less clearly parameters of&#13;
limitation based on article 43 and 44 of Law Number 28 of 2014.&#13;
The purpose of the study is to explain the regulation and application of fair&#13;
use doctrine on the YouTube platform based on Indonesia and United States&#13;
laws, to find out the similarities and differences between the two    countries, and&#13;
to learn on US copyright’s legal rules that can applied in Indonesia regarding&#13;
the regulation and application fair use on the platform YouTube.&#13;
This research uses normative legal method. It focuses on written    legal&#13;
norms. This research uses library research and comparative approach. Data for&#13;
this thesis consists of primary legal authorities, secondary legal authorities and&#13;
tertiary legal authorities. The data technique used is qualitative analysis.&#13;
The result of this research shows that Indonesia and United States have&#13;
several similarities because both countries agree the same convention&#13;
international and the categories of fair use in video that upload on the YouTube&#13;
platform purpose for education, criticism, and knowledge. However     &#13;
differences are also found in Indonesia law term fair use is restriction and it has&#13;
not provide specific regulation and   application of fair use doctrine on the&#13;
YouTube platform. Indonesia can be learned from the United States regulation&#13;
similar to US Copyright Act 1976's four-factor clearly parameter of limitation.&#13;
There are recommendations for additions and update Indonesia Copyright&#13;
law of 2014 regarding application fair use on the YouTube platform. Additions&#13;
clearly parameter of limitation such as four factor parameter in section 107 of&#13;
US the Copyright Act 1976. Update the regulation Indonesia provides&#13;
regulated to measure of the effect of application fair use on the potential market&#13;
in a video content work for protection economically right from original&#13;
creation. Update the regulation Indonesia learn from US has DMCA&#13;
comprehensively legal certainly to resolve dispute fair use case. It easier for&#13;
judges to resolve fair use cases. Legal adviser and judge determination&#13;
parameter of limitation fair use based four factor in section 107 of copyright&#13;
Act 1976.</note>
 <note type="statement of responsibility"></note>
 <classification>0</classification>
 <identifier type="isbn"></identifier>
 <location>
  <physicalLocation>ELECTRONIC THESES AND DISSERTATION Universitas Syiah Kuala</physicalLocation>
  <shelfLocator></shelfLocator>
 </location>
 <slims:digitals/>
</mods>
<recordInfo>
 <recordIdentifier>115413</recordIdentifier>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2023-09-19 21:44:49</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2023-09-20 11:22:42</recordChangeDate>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</modsCollection>