Electronic Theses and Dissertation

Revolusi industri 4.0 telah mendorong perkembangan pesat dalam teknologi jaringan komputer, memunculkan kebutuhan akan jaringan dinamis yang dapat diatur secara efisien. salah satu solusi yang muncul adalah software defined network (sdn), yang memisahkan control plane dan data plane untuk pengaturan terpusat melalui protokol openflow. penelitian ini membandingkan kinerja dua controller sdn, yaitu ryu dan opendaylight, dalam konteks metode quality of service (qos) dengan standar tiphon mencakup pengujian menggunakan mininet pada graphical network simulator 3 (gns3) dengan variasi topologi switch dan host. pengujian dilakukan menggunakan distributed internet traffic generator (d-itg) untuk throughput, delay, jitter, dan packet loss, serta phoronix test suite untuk analisis resource utilization. dalam memilih controller, faktor-faktor seperti throughput, delay, jitter, dan packet loss perlu dipertimbangkan bersamaan dengan penggunaan sumber daya cpu dan memory. seperti hasil pada topologi 6 switch 12 host, controller ryu menunjukkan nilai rata-rata throughput sebesar 4425,433 kbps, delay 1,3004 ms, jitter 0,2886 ms, packet loss 0%. sedangkan controller opendaylight memiliki throughput 3638,014 kbps, delay 1,3648 ms, jitter 0,3171 ms, packet loss 0%. hasil serupa terlihat pada topologi 8 switch 16 host dan 10 switch 20 host, di mana menunjukkan bahwa kedua controller, baik ryu maupun opendaylight, menunjukkan kinerja yang sangat baik berdasarkan standar tiphon dalam berbagai variasi topologi. namun, penambahan background traffic secara signifikan mempengaruhi throughput, delay, dan jitter. meskipun demikian, peningkatan jumlah switch dan host tidak begitu berpengaruh terhadap kinerja cpu dan memory. sehingga, hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kinerja ryu secara konsisten lebih baik daripada opendaylight dalam parameter-parameter tersebut.

The Fourth Industrial Revolution has propelled rapid advancements in computer network technology, giving rise to the necessity for dynamically manageable networks. One solution that has emerged is Software Defined Network (SDN), which segregates the control plane and data plane for centralized management via the OpenFlow protocol. This study compares the performance of two SDN controllers, Ryu and OpenDaylight, within the context of Quality of Service (QoS) methods adhering to the TIPHON standard. The comparison includes testing using Mininet on Graphical Network Simulator 3 (GNS3) with various switch and host topology variations. Testing involved the Distributed Internet Traffic Generator (D-ITG) for throughput, delay, jitter, and packet loss, and the Phoronix Test Suite for resource utilization analysis. When selecting a controller, factors such as throughput, delay, jitter, and packet loss need to be considered alongside CPU and memory resource usage. For instance, in the results for the topology with 6 switches and 12 hosts, the Ryu controller exhibited an average throughput of 4425.433 Kbps, a delay of 1.3004 ms, a jitter of 0.2886 ms, and a packet loss of 0%. While the OpenDaylight controller had a throughput of 3638.014 Kbps, a delay of 1.3648 ms, and a jitter of 0.3171 ms, packet loss was 0%. Similar results were observed in topologies with 8 switches and 16 hosts, and 10 switches and 20 hosts, indicating that both controllers, Ryu and OpenDaylight, performed exceptionally well based on the TIPHON standard across various topology variations. However, the addition of background traffic significantly affected throughput, delay, and jitter. Nonetheless, increasing the number of switches and hosts had minimal impact on CPU and memory performance. Therefore, the research findings consistently demonstrated that Ryu outperformed OpenDaylight in these parameters.