Universitas Syiah Kuala | ELECTRONIC THESES AND DISSERTATION

Electronic Theses and Dissertation

Universitas Syiah Kuala

    SKRIPSI
Cut Zakiyatun Nisak, ANALISIS BUTIR SOAL MATEMATIKA HASIL RESPONS GOOGLE FORM DI KELAS X MAN 1 ACEH BESAR. Banda Aceh Fakultas KIP Matematika,2023

Abstrak cut zakiyatun nisak (2023). analisis butir soal matematika hasil respons google form di kelas x man 1 aceh besar. evaluasi merupakan bagian penting dalam pembelajaran yang berfungsi untuk melihat ketercapaian dari tujuan pembelajaran yang telah dilaksanakan dan sebagai masukan bagi proses pembelajaran. pada masa sekarang guru matematika telah mulai membuat soal-soal evaluasi secara online salah satunya menggunakan aplikasi google form, namun analisis terhadap soal-soal buatan guru tersebut masih terbatas baik dari segi validitas, reliabilitas, tingkat kesukaran, daya beda dan pengecoh/distraktor. penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tingkat validitas, reliabilitas, tingkat kesukaran, daya beda dan pengecoh/distraktor dari butir soal ujian matematika buatan guru menggunakan hasil respons google form di kelas x man 1 aceh besar. penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kuantitatif, dengan mengumpulkan hasil respons siswa dari jawaban siswa terhadap soal yang dibuat guru sebagai sumber data. data diperoleh berdasarkan hasil respons siswa menjawab soal pilihan ganda sebanyak 30 soal yang di input ke dalam google form, dan diperoleh 176 hasil respons siswa di kelas x. analisis data dilakukan dengan menggunakan uji validitas, reliabilitas, tingkat kesukaran, daya beda dan pengecoh/distraktor. hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa soal matematika buatan guru sebanyak 25 butir soal tergolong valid, namun selebihnya yaitu 5 butir soal tidak valid dengan derajat validitas sedang 36,7% dan derajat validitas rendah 63,3%. reliabilitas pada soal tidak reliabel berada pada derajat reliabilitas sedang. tingkat kesukaran diperoleh 33,3% terlalu sukar, 56,7% sukar, dan 10% sedang. daya beda diperoleh 3,3% membeda, 26,7% sedang, 53,3% tidak membeda dan 16,7% diragukan. pengecoh/distraktor diperoleh semua option jawaban diterima karena telah dipilih oleh peserta ujian dengan persentase > 5%. kata kunci: google form, validitas, reliabilitas, tingkat kesukaran, daya beda, pengecoh/distraktor.



Abstract

ABSTRACT Cut Zakiyatun Nisak ​​(2023). Analysis of Math Question Items from Google Form Response Results in Class X MAN 1 Aceh Besar. Evaluation is an important part of learning which functions to see the achievement of the learning objectives that have been implemented and as input for the learning process. At present mathematics teachers have started making evaluation questions online, one of which is using the Google Form application, but the analysis of the teacher's questions is still limited both in terms of validity, reliability, level of difficulty, discriminating power and distractors. This study aims to determine the level of validity, reliability, level of difficulty, discriminatory power and distractors from teacher-made math test items using the results of google form responses in class X MAN 1 Aceh Besar. This study uses a quantitative descriptive method, by collecting the results of student responses from students' answers to questions made by the teacher as a data source. The data was obtained based on the results of student responses answering multiple choice questions of 30 questions which were inputted into the Google form, and 176 student responses in class X were obtained. Data analysis was carried out using validity, reliability, difficulty level, discriminating power and distractor tests. . The results showed that 25 items of teacher-made math questions were classified as valid, but the remaining 5 items were invalid with a moderate degree of validity of 36.7% and a low degree of validity of 63.3%. Reliability on unreliable questions is at a moderate degree of reliability. The level of difficulty obtained is 33.3% too difficult, 56.7% difficult, and 10% moderate. Distinguishing power obtained 3.3% different, 26.7% moderate, 53.3% not different and 16.7% doubtful. The distractor/distractor obtained all answer options accepted because they had been chosen by the examinee with a percentage of > 5%. Keywords: Google Form, Validity, Reliability, Difficulty Level, Differentiation, Detractors/Distractors.



    SERVICES DESK