Electronic Theses and Dissertation

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Banda Aceh Nomor 133/Pid.B/2023/Pn.Bna, memutuskan Terdakwa bersalah melakukan tindak pidana penganiayaan terhadap korban berinisial JD. Akibat perbuatannya terdakwa didakwakan Pasal 351 Ayat (1) KUHP dengan hukuman penjara 2 bulan dikurangkan masa tahanan yang telah dijalani oleh terdakwa. Dalam putusan itu, pemilihan dasar hukum oleh jaksa penuntut umum kurang tepat, mengingat fakta – fakta yang terungkap selama proses pengadilan bahwa terdakwa terindikasi melakukan penganiayaan secara berencana.
Tujuan penulisan studi kasus ini adalah untuk menjelaskan tindakan jaksa penuntut umum dalam memilih dasar hukum kurang tepat dan penjatuhan putusan oleh hakim belum mencapai unsur keadilan, kemanfaatan dan kepastian hukum terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Banda Aceh Nomor : 133/Pid.B/2023/PN Bna.
Jenis penelitian terhadap Penulisan penelitian terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Banda Aceh Nomor : 133/Pid.B/2023/PN Bna ini yaitu jenis penelitian normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan – pendekatan dengan meneliti data sekunder. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan studi dokumen atau pengumpulan data sekunder atau studi kepustakaan yang diperoleh dari penelitian kepustakaan.
Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa jaksa penuntut umum kurang tepat dalam memilih dasar hukum yang didakwakan terhadap terdakwa pada putusan Pengadilan Negeri Banda Aceh Nomor : 133/Pid.B/2023/PN Bna, semestinya jaksa penuntut umum menuntut terdakwa dengan pasal 353 ayat (1) tentang penganiayaan secara berencana, karena pasal ini yang lebih sesuai dengan perbuatan terdakwa yang melakukan tindak pidana secara berencana. Serta putusan hakim pada putusan Pengadilan Negeri Banda Aceh Nomor : 133/Pid.B/2023/PN Bna tidak mencapai unsur keadilan, kemanfaatan dan kepastian hukum. Putusan hakim terhadap terdakwa dinilai terlalu ringan mengingat fakta bahwa terdakwa terindikasi melakukan tindak pidana secara berencana dan akibat dari perbuatan terdakwa membuat saksi korban tidak dapat berjualan kurang lebih selama 2 bulan.
Diharapkan agar jaksa penuntut umum lebih cermat memperhatikan fakta yang terjadi sesuai keterangan saksi – saksi sebelum membuat surat dakwaaan dan majelis hakim diharapkan dalam memutus sebuah putusan lebih dapat memperhatikan unsur keadilan, kemanfaatan dan kepastian hukum.

The Banda Aceh District Court Decision Number 133/Pid.B/2023/Pn.Bna, found the Defendant guilty of committing a criminal act of assault against the victim with the initials JD. As a result of his actions, the defendant was charged with Article 351 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code with a prison sentence of 2 months minus the detention period that had been served by the defendant. In the decision, the selection of the legal basis by the public prosecutor was inappropriate, considering the facts revealed during the court process that the defendant was indicated to have committed premeditated assault. The purpose of writing this case study is to explain the actions of the public prosecutor in choosing an inappropriate legal basis and the decision by the judge has not achieved the elements of justice, benefit and legal certainty regarding the Banda Aceh District Court Decision Number: 133/Pid.B/2023/PN Bna. The type of research on the Writing of research on the Banda Aceh District Court Decision Number: 133/Pid.B/2023/PN Bna is a type of normative research using approaches by examining secondary data. Data collection was carried out by document study or secondary data collection or literature study obtained from literature research. The results of the study showed that the public prosecutor was less precise in choosing the legal basis charged against the defendant in the Banda Aceh District Court decision Number: 133 / Pid.B / 2023 / PN Bna, the public prosecutor should have charged the defendant with Article 353 paragraph (1) concerning premeditated assault, because this article is more in accordance with the actions of the defendant who committed a crime in a planned manner. And the judge's decision in the Banda Aceh District Court decision Number: 133 / Pid.B / 2023 / PN Bna did not achieve the elements of justice, benefit and legal certainty. The judge's decision against the defendant was considered too light considering the fact that the defendant was indicated to have committed a premeditated crime and as a result of the defendant's actions, the victim witness was unable to sell for approximately 2 months. It is hoped that the public prosecutor will be more careful in paying attention to the facts that occurred according to the statements of the witnesses before making an indictment and the panel of judges is expected to be able to pay more attention to the elements of justice, benefit and legal certainty in deciding a decision.